&nbsp.According to Berliner and Biddle, for instance, the implementation of new academic-performance standards was ‘misdirected’, like this, and similar, reforms did not lead to any significant changes in the field. Nonetheless, despite such criticisms, numerous investigations and surveys published around 2003, the report’s 20th anniversary, purported to show that the progress done in the field of education was rather significant, with more rigorous course requirements being especially referenced (“A Nation at Risk”).
To my mind, the problems that A Nation at Risk highlighted are still with us, as the public school system is often under-financed, a teachers’ shortage problem is not solved yet, and the education standards are somewhat lacking to face the shifting realities of the U.S. and world economy’s requirements. The conduct of educational reform is dependent entirely on the national and state institutions that are charged with the development of the educational sphere. That is why the persistent delays in the conduct of necessary educational reforms point to the absence of political will on behalf of their establishment.
Works Cited
“A Nation at Risk.” EdWeek.org. Education Week, 3 August 2004. Web. 16 June 2012.

You may also like

Publication Bans

A public bank can be issued if it is necessary

Whether Royal Prerogative Powers Are Unnecessary

There is near consensus amongst the members of Parliament and

Observation Riding Public Transportation

And whether or not they are rich or poor people